|
In
the former socialist countries the lasting experience of communism remains
the biggest influence on the business environment. They have made
significant progress in transforming institutions and systems but old
expectations and beliefs about business and institutional life still
remain, even among a younger generation.
There is a deep distrust of corporate or public institutions, the feeling
that they are not there to serve the interests of their employees, clients
and customers but those who have power within them. Instead, people relied
on networks of family and close friends for emotional and economic
support. With the collapse and transformation of institutions these
networks became even more important.
Feelings
of inferiority towards westerners create defensive barriers. A comment
often made by people who grew up in these countries is that they were cut
off from the rest of the world. They feel they lack the knowledge,
experience and skills necessary to work on the same footing as other
Europeans. Attitudes such as these influence all levels of interaction
from negotiation to the daily encounters of normal business life. For
example, most western employees are used to the management techniques of
coaching and evaluation. The basic elements of these techniques –
performance measurement, self-appraisal, personal goal setting – can
hark back to the self-criticism and public censure of the old days. Those
old enough to remember communism have learned to distrust commitment to
organisations, to keep themselves to themselves, to be careful not to
reveal anything that might be held against them.
Western managers wishing
to introduce team-based management methods may also come across resistance
from those who remember the teams they belonged to in the Soviet period.
From childhood in the Pioneers and Oktobryaska to work groups in factories
and offices people were organized into teams that competed with each
other. However the organisation, goals, and processes of these teams was
handed down from above. The idea that a team was autonomous and that
individuals within it shared responsibility for goals and performance was
discouraged. Far from being empowering a team was restricting and
oppressive. Appealing to the success of the team is not as motivating as
it is in some other cultures Managers who come in from outside with glib
talk of teams perhaps should make sure that everyone shares the same
understanding of how they should work...
|
|